Securities Attorney for Going Public Transactions

Securities Lawyer Blog

knowledge itself is power

The Reverse Merger Alternative to an IPO: Technique Gaining Traction in Life Sciences Sector

In recent years, alternative paths to public ownership and trading liquidity have emerged, with reverse mergers standing out as both a modern and historical method for private companies to become publicly traded. Despite some past abuses, reverse mergers remain a legitimate strategy for smaller private companies, especially in high-risk industries like life sciences, that need significant capital but lack the attributes demanded by the IPO market.

The New Reverse Merger Landscape

Reverse mergers have gained traction due to the challenging conditions in the traditional IPO market. Public companies that are ideal candidates for reverse mergers typically possess the following attributes:

  • Material Net Cash: Providing the necessary capital similar to what would be raised in a traditional IPO.

  • Limited Operations and Liabilities: Ensuring a clean slate for the merging entity.

  • Stockholder Approval: Confidence in obtaining the requisite votes to approve the transaction.

  • Exchange Listing: Maintaining a listing on a major exchange like Nasdaq or NYSE post-transaction.

Since late 2021, there has been a significant increase in reverse mergers, particularly involving life sciences companies trading below their cash valuations. These transactions allow public companies to reinvest their cash into the private company's business, offering legacy stockholders a chance to participate in a new venture while the private company benefits from the public listing and existing cash reserves.

Structure of a Reverse Merger

A typical reverse merger involves:

  1. Merger of Private and Public Companies: The privately held company merges with the publicly listed entity.

  2. Ownership Transition: Pre-merger stockholders of the private company become the majority owners of the combined company.

  3. Management Integration: The private company's management and employees take over the combined entity.

  4. Board Representation: The board composition reflects the new ownership split.

  5. Business Continuity: The private company's business becomes the business of the public company.

  6. Name Change: The combined company adopts the private company’s name.

Often, the combined company seeks to raise additional capital to extend its operational runway.

Key Considerations in Reverse Mergers

Exchange Ratio: The exchange ratio is based on the relative valuations of the public and private companies. While the private company's valuation often hinges on its last private financing, the public company's valuation typically equals its net cash at closing plus a premium for its public listing.

SEC Filing and Review: Reverse mergers require a merger proxy statement or a Form S-4 registration statement, which can be more complex and time-consuming than a conventional IPO filing. These filings must include detailed financial statements, a thorough description of the merger process, and often attract SEC scrutiny and potential lawsuits, extending the timeline to 3-6 months or longer.

Board Process and Conflicts of Interest: The public company's board must navigate potential conflicts of interest, especially if directors have ties to the private company. Implementing procedural safeguards, such as special committees and majority of minority votes, can help preserve the business judgment standard of review and mitigate legal challenges.

Merger Agreement Specifics: Key points in negotiations include:

  • Minimum Net Cash Closing Condition: Ensuring the public company has a specified minimum net cash at closing.

  • Net Cash Definition: Detailed negotiation of what constitutes "net cash," including contingent liabilities.

  • Contingent Value Rights/Dividends: Providing legacy stockholders with rights to future proceeds from legacy assets or cash dividends.

  • Termination Fees and Expense Reimbursement: Establishing broader circumstances for these provisions compared to typical public M&A deals.

Conclusion

Reverse mergers offer a strategic alternative to traditional IPOs, providing a viable path for private companies, especially in high-risk industries, to access public capital and liquidity. By understanding the complexities and intricacies of these transactions, companies can effectively navigate the reverse merger process to achieve their strategic objectives. For tailored advice and guidance through this process, contact our legal experts who specialize in M&A and reverse mergers.

Gayatri Gupta