Securities Attorney for Going Public Transactions

Securities Lawyer Blog

knowledge itself is power

FDIC Proposes Revisions to Policy on Bank Merger Transactions

On March 21, 2024, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) Board of Directors approved proposed revisions to its Statement of Policy on Bank Merger Transactions (the Proposal). This development marks a significant shift in how the FDIC evaluates bank mergers under the Bank Merger Act (BMA). As legal advisors, it is crucial to understand the implications of these changes and how they affect our clients’ strategic decisions regarding mergers and acquisitions in the banking sector.

Key Elements of the Proposal

The Proposal adopts a principles-based approach aimed at updating, strengthening, and clarifying the FDIC's policies on bank merger evaluations. It outlines evaluative considerations for each statutory factor applicable to merger transactions, including monopolistic or anti-competitive effects and potential risks to the stability of the U.S. banking or financial system.

Guiding Principles for Statutory Factors

  1. Monopolistic or Anti-Competitive Effects

    The FDIC prohibits mergers that result in a banking monopoly or substantially lessen competition. Evaluations will consider:

    • The size and competitive effects of the resulting institution.

    • Geographic and product market concentrations.

    • Specific products or customer segments beyond deposits, such as small business or residential loans.

    • Potential divestitures or prohibition of non-compete agreements as conditions for merger approval.

  2. Financial Resources

    The FDIC will not approve mergers resulting in a weaker institution. Considerations include:

    • Ability to meet capital standards and maintain sufficient liquidity.

    • Financial effects of related entities on the resulting institution.

    • Potential imposition of higher capital requirements.

  3. Managerial Resources

    Management must possess the capacity to implement post-merger integration effectively. Considerations include:

    • Supervisory capacity and history.

    • Risk and compliance management.

    • Adequacy of succession planning and response to supervisory recommendations.

  4. Future Prospects

    Evaluations will consider the future prospects of the entities involved, including:

    • Economic environment and competitive landscape.

    • History in integrating merger targets and managing growth.

    • Maintenance of an acceptable risk profile.

  5. Convenience and Needs of the Community

    Mergers must result in an institution better positioned to meet community needs. Considerations include:

    • Higher lending limits and greater access to products and services.

    • Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) records and consumer protection compliance.

  6. Risk to the Stability of the U.S. Banking or Financial System

    Mergers should not materially increase systemic risk. The FDIC will consider:

    • Size and complexity of the resulting institution.

    • Interconnectedness with the U.S. banking or financial system.

    • Availability of substitute providers for critical services.

  7. Effectiveness in Combatting Money Laundering Activities

    The FDIC requires effective anti-money laundering (AML) and countering the financing of terrorism (CFT) programs. Considerations include:

    • AML/CFT program reviews, policies, and risk management.

    • Remediation efforts and compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA).

Strategic Implications

Heightened Scrutiny for Large Mergers

The Proposal indicates that mergers resulting in institutions larger than $100 billion will face added scrutiny due to financial stability concerns. This suggests that strategic consolidation at higher tiers may encounter significant regulatory challenges.

Public Hearings and CRA Protests

For mergers resulting in institutions around the $50 billion mark or those with significant CRA protests, the FDIC may hold public hearings. This move underscores the FDIC's commitment to transparency and public interest in merger evaluations.

Potential Deterrent for Strategic M&A

The Proposal’s emphasis on preventing further industry concentration may act as a deterrent for some strategic M&A transactions. However, mergers intended to prevent the failure of an institution may still proceed, highlighting the FDIC's balanced approach.

Public Commentary and Finalization

The Proposal is open for public comment for 60 days post-publication in the Federal Register. It is essential for legal advisors to stay informed about the finalization process and provide feedback to shape the final policy.

Conclusion

The FDIC’s proposed revisions to its bank merger policies represent a significant shift towards a more rigorous and transparent evaluation process. As legal advisors, it is imperative to guide our clients through these changes, ensuring compliance and strategic alignment with the new regulatory landscape. By understanding and anticipating the FDIC’s considerations, we can better navigate the complexities of bank mergers and support our clients in achieving their business objectives.

For more detailed guidance on how these changes may affect your specific transactions, please contact our experienced legal team.

Gayatri Gupta