Securities Attorney for Going Public Transactions

Securities Lawyer Blog

knowledge itself is power

Eye-Opening Verdict: Lashify’s Patent Win Curls Industry Expectations

In a significant victory for Lashify, a jury in Judge Albright’s Western District of Texas courtroom awarded the lash extension company $30.5 million in lost profits after finding that Worldbeauty, a seller of discount drugstore lashes, had infringed on Lashify's patents. The jury's decision underscores the importance of patent protection and the complexities involved in patent litigation.

The Jury's Verdict: A Breakdown

The jury answered three key questions in favor of Lashify:

  1. Direct Infringement: The jury found that Worldbeauty had directly infringed on all three of Lashify's asserted patent claims.

  2. Willful Infringement: The jury determined that Worldbeauty's infringement was willful, a finding that could lead to enhanced damages.

  3. Validity of Patents: The jury rejected Worldbeauty's claim that the patents were invalid due to obviousness in light of prior art.

As a result, Lashify was awarded $30.5 million in lost profits. This figure is particularly significant given that it includes convoyed sales—sales of related products such as applicators, bond, sealant, and remover kits that are typically sold with the lash extensions.

What's Next? Post-Verdict Motions and Potential Appeals

Given the substantial damages award, it's expected that Worldbeauty will file post-verdict motions, including a motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) and possibly an appeal challenging the jury’s decision, particularly the lost profits award. Lashify, on the other hand, is likely to seek treble damages due to the willfulness finding, as well as attorney fees.

Injunctive Relief and Ongoing Litigation

Lashify is also expected to seek injunctive relief to prevent further sales of the infringing products by Worldbeauty. This request, along with any enhanced damages, will be decided by Judge Albright. Given the jury's finding of willful infringement, the court may be inclined to grant a permanent injunction, further solidifying Lashify’s market position.

Broader Implications for the Beauty Industry

This case highlights the growing importance of intellectual property in the beauty industry, where innovation is rapidly transforming product lines. Lashify’s success in protecting its patented technology may encourage other beauty companies to take a more aggressive stance in defending their intellectual property.

Parallel Proceedings and Global Strategy

In addition to the Texas case, Lashify is also pursuing action in the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC). Although the USITC initially found that Lashify failed to demonstrate a domestic industry, this decision is currently on appeal at the Federal Circuit. The outcome of this appeal could have significant implications for Lashify’s ability to protect its products on a global scale, especially given its claim that it has created a new market segment within the U.S.

Conclusion

Lashify’s $30.5 million win is a landmark case in the ongoing battle over intellectual property rights in the beauty industry. As the case continues to unfold, particularly with potential appeals and further litigation, it will provide valuable insights into the enforcement of patent rights and the legal strategies companies can employ to protect their innovations.

Gayatri Gupta