Securities Attorney for Going Public Transactions

Securities Lawyer Blog

knowledge itself is power

SEC Publishes New C&DI on Filing Fee Table and Inline XBRL

In the fourth quarter of 2023, the SEC released several new compliance and disclosure interpretations (C&DIs) on various topics, including cyber incident disclosure, proxy and information statements, the inclusion of securities in the filing fee exhibit, and Inline XBRL. This blog post is the final entry in a series covering these new C&DIs.

Filing Fee Table Guidance

Questions 239.02 and 240.17: A well-known seasoned issuer (WKSI) registers securities on an automatic shelf registration statement and opts to defer payment of filing fees pursuant to Rule 456(b). The issuer later files a prospectus supplement for a pay-as-you-go deferred fee payment under Rules 456(b) and 457(r), which includes the required filing fee exhibit. The question arises whether Table 1 of the filing fee exhibit must list all the securities from the initial registration statement or just those being offered in the prospectus supplement for which fees are being paid.

Answer: Table 1 must include the securities for which a deferred fee is being paid in the “Fees to Be Paid” lines. There is no need to repeat previously included rows that reflect the registration of classes of securities in an indeterminate amount under Rule 457(r) in either the “fees to be paid” or “fees previously paid” lines. Additionally, the issuer does not need to include securities in the “fees previously paid” line if the issuer has already paid a fee for those securities as part of the same offering or any prior offering.

Inline XBRL Guidance

Questions 146.18 and 101.10: Item 601(a)(2) of Regulation S-K specifies that an exhibit index does not need to include a hyperlink to an exhibit filed in XBRL. This raises the question of whether this exception also applies to exhibits filed in Inline XBRL.

Answer: No, the exception does not apply to exhibits filed in Inline XBRL. The reference in Item 601(a)(2) to exhibits filed in XBRL pertains to exhibits filed in unconverted code, which is only machine-readable. As per Release No. 33-10322 (March 1, 2017), an exhibit tagged in Inline XBRL is not considered to be filed in unconverted code.

Conclusion

The new C&DIs provide essential clarifications for issuers regarding the filing fee table and Inline XBRL requirements. Understanding these updates is crucial for compliance and accurate reporting.

Gayatri Gupta