Securities Attorney for Going Public Transactions

Securities Lawyer Blog

knowledge itself is power

Streamlining Corporate Name Changes: An Alternative Path for Public Companies

For public companies looking to change their name, navigating the traditional process of amending articles of incorporation can be time-consuming and expensive, especially given the shareholder approval and SEC requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. However, an alternative approach available in some states—using a subsidiary merger—allows companies to expedite the name change without direct shareholder consent.

Traditional Name Change Process
Under standard rules, a name change requires amending the articles of incorporation, which often involves holding shareholder meetings or obtaining written consent. For companies subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, any solicitation of shareholder votes necessitates compliance with SEC proxy disclosure rules, usually involving Schedule 14A or 14C forms.

Using a Subsidiary for a Simplified Name Change
In states like Delaware and Nevada, companies can create a wholly-owned subsidiary under the desired new name and execute a short-form merger. Here, the parent company adopts the subsidiary's name and avoids the traditional shareholder approval route. For companies subject to SEC reporting requirements, a Form 8-K is typically filed to disclose the name change.

Steps include:

  1. Gaining board approval for forming a subsidiary.

  2. Creating a new subsidiary under the desired name.

  3. Merging the subsidiary into the parent company, with the parent adopting the subsidiary’s name.

  4. Obtaining a new CUSIP number.

  5. Notifying FINRA of the corporate action for an OTC markets update.

State Provisions in Delaware and Nevada
In Delaware, DGCL Section 251 allows a parent-subsidiary merger without shareholder approval if the parent holds at least 80% of the subsidiary. Similarly, Nevada's NRS 92A.180 allows this type of merger if the parent owns at least 90% of the subsidiary, permitting only amendments to the corporate name during the merger.

This approach provides an efficient pathway for companies to rebrand or align with new corporate identities without the additional expenses of traditional name change protocols.

Gayatri Gupta